Data Insights

Diverse capital partners within food and agriculture philanthropy are, by and large, systems-thinkers, working across the intersections of climate, justice, health, farming practices, and market infrastructure.

As a national network of over 120 members, SAFSF has a unique opportunity to track the nuanced funding practices of this interconnected sector. Each year, we collect data from our members on their funding scope, strategies, annual giving, high-level Areas of Impact, and corresponding sub-areas. Because our members represent a diverse cross-section of funding in this space, this self-reported dataset offers a meaningful window into broader trends in sustainable food and agriculture philanthropy and impact investment.

The six Areas of Impact in our taxonomy are:

  • Agricultural Products
  • Environment and Climate
  • Farms and Farming Systems
  • Health, Nutrition and Hunger
  • Justice
  • Markets

We use this data to inform our own strategy and evaluation, and to surface trends that help the broader field understand where funding is headed and where the gaps remain.

Have a question, a theme you’re seeing in your own work, or an area you’d like us to track? Reach out at [email protected] and help shape our data strategy.


Explore Our Data Insights Reports

Newly launched in 2026, our Data Insights reports explore funding trends within the SAFSF membership and the broader field. Each report draws on data we collect annually from our members.

Environment and Climate

Our first report examines how environmental and climate funding is understood and invested in across the SAFSF membership. We hope the insights offer food and agriculture funders perspective on their role in climate resilience and environmental sustainability, and offer climate-focused funders a clearer view of the dimensions of food and agriculture that drive positive climate outcomes.

Here’s a quick look at funding trends among SAFSF Members:

  • Environmental and climate funding is at a historic high
  • Climate Change remains a top priority for food and agriculture funders
  • Commitment to racial equity and environmental funding go hand in hand
  • National funders are the most likely to fund Environment and Climate